7
The Committee received report ES/0275 of the Head of Planning and Coastal Management, which related to planning application DC/19/4322/FUL.
The application site was located on the northern side of Main Road, Kesgrave, and in planning terms was considered to be in the countryside. The application sought to replace the existing bungalow with a larger property located in a different position within the site.
The application was presented to the Referral Panel on 23 December 2019. At this meeting it was decided that the application should be determined by the Committee so that it could give full consideration to whether the proposal was 'more visually intrusive in the countryside', particularly with regard to the increased footprint in relation to Policy DM3 of the Suffolk Coastal Local Plan.
The Committee received a presentation on the application from the Senior Planning and Enforcement Officer. The site location was outlined and the site's proximity to the physical limits boundary of Kesgrave was established.
The application was for a 1:1 replacement of a dwelling in the countryside. Officers were of the view that the proposed dwelling was not more visually intrusive in the countryside than the existing dwelling. Although the new dwelling would have a larger footprint it would be, overall, a similar size to the existing dwelling.
The Committee was shown several photographs of the site, outlining its relationship to the surrounding area and highlighting where the new dwelling would be positioned on the site. The Committee was also shown comparisons between the existing streetscene and proposed streetscene, and the existing site layout and the proposed site layout. The proposed floor plans and elevations were also displayed.
The key issue was summarised as being whether the new dwelling would be more visually intrusive in the countryside than the building it was replacing.
The recommendation to approve and its conditions, as set out in the report, were outlined.
The Chairman invited questions to the officers.
The Senior Planning and Enforcement Officer outlined the route from the vehicular access with Doctor Watson's Lane to the proposed garages. It was confirmed that the existing vehicular access would be used, and that the removal of an existing fence and the repositioning of the dwelling would improve the visibility of the visual access. It was also acknowledged that the proposal would result in more traffic movements on and off the site.
The Committee was advised that any fencing adjacent to the highway would need to be subject to a separate planning application.
The Chairman invited Mr Kirkpatrick, the applicant's agent, to address the Committee. Mr Webb, the applicant, accompanied Mr Kirkpatrick to answer any questions that the Committee had.
Mr Kirkpatrick noted that the Senior Planning and Enforcement Officer's report had been thorough. He confirmed that the existing vehicular access would be retained, and that the visibility splay would be improved.
Mr Kirkpatrick also advised that there was no intention to replace the hedge bordering Main Road with fencing.
The Chairman invited questions to Mr Kirkpatrick and Mr Webb.
The Committee was advised that the fencing currently adjacent to the vehicular access would be removed to improve visibility.
There being no further public speaking, the Chairman invited the Committee to debate the application that was before it.
The Chairman opened debate, noting her familiarity with the site as she had lived opposite it for 20 years. The current dwelling was a modest bungalow and was no longer suitable to downsize to. The Chairman considered that the proposed dwelling was a like for like replacement in terms of a dwelling in the countryside, suggesting that it would be a benefit to the visibility on what was currently a dangerous junction between Doctor Watson's Lane and Main Road.
Several members of the Committee agreed with the Chairman's comments, highlighting that the proposed dwelling would not be more visually intrusive, was in keeping with its surroundings and noting the impact of the BT buildings in the background. One member of the Committee considered that that the proposed dwelling would be less visually intrusive than what was currently on the site and would improve road safety, stating that the design was a contemporary one.
There was some debate on the possibility of a new fence on the side of the site bordering Main Road, as this had been a reason for Kesgrave Town Council objecting to the application. The Chairman stated that this was one of several objecting reasons given by Kesgrave Town Council, and the Planning Development Manager said that the plans shown displayed an existing fence.
It was confirmed that the tree on the site would be retained.
There being no further debate the Chairman moved to the recommendation to approve, as set out in the report.
On the proposition of Councillor Cooper, seconded by Councillor Blundell it was by unanimous vote
RESOLVED
That the application be APPROVED, subject to the following conditions:
1. The development hereby permitted shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.
Reason: This condition is imposed in accordance with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).
2. The development hereby permitted shall be completed in all respects strictly in accordance with Site Location Plan received 7 November 2019, Drawing Nos. 181019 and 191019 received 5 November 2019 and Ecology Report received 18 November 2019 for which permission is hereby granted or which are subsequently submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority and in compliance with any conditions imposed by the Local Planning Authority.
Reason: For the avoidance of doubt as to what has been considered and approved.
3. The materials and finishes shall be as indicated within the submitted application and thereafter retained as such, unless otherwise agreed in writing with the local planning authority.
Reason: To ensure the satisfactory appearance of the development in the interests of visual amenity
4. No other part of the development hereby permitted shall be commenced until the existing vehicular access has been improved, laid out and completed in all respects in accordance with DM01; and with an entrance width of 3 metres. Thereafter the access shall be retained in the specified form.
Reason: In the interests of highway safety to ensure that the layout of the access is properly designed, constructed and provided before the development is commenced.
5. Prior to the dwelling hereby permitted being first occupied, the vehicular access onto the highway shall be properly surfaced with a bound material for a minimum distance of 5 metres from the edge of the metalled carriageway.
Reason: To secure appropriate improvements to the vehicular access in the interests of highway safety.
6. Before the development is commenced details shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority showing the means to prevent the discharge of surface water from the development onto the highway. The approved scheme shall be carried out in its entirety before the access is first used and shall be retained thereafter in its approved form.
Reason: To prevent hazards caused by flowing water or ice on the highway.
7. Prior to occupation of the dwelling hereby permitted, precise details of the areas to be provided for the loading, unloading, manoeuvring and parking of vehicles including secure cycle storage shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. The approved scheme shall be carried out in its entirety before the development is brought into use and shall be retained thereafter and used for no other purpose.
Reason: To ensure the provision and long term maintenance of adequate on-site space for the parking and manoeuvring of vehicles in accordance with Suffolk Guidance for Parking (2015) where on-street parking and manoeuvring would be detrimental to highway safety.
8. Development must be undertaken in accordance with the ecological avoidance, mitigation, compensation and enhancement measures identified within Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA) (Abrehart Ecology, December 2019).
Reason: In order that there will no harm to any protected or priority species on the site.
9. No development, demolition, site clearance (including clearance of vegetation) or earth moving shall take place, or material or machinery be brought onto the site, until a plan detailing Reasonable Avoidance Measures (RAMS) for how ecological receptors (particularly protected and UK Priority species (under Section 41 of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act (2006))) will be protected during site clearance has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. All site clearance (including clearance of vegetation) shall be undertaken in accordance with the approved plan.
Reason: In order that there will no harm to any protected or priority species on the site.
10. No development shall commence or any materials, plant or machinery be brought on to the site until fencing to protect the trees along the eastern site boundary has been erected 1 metre beyond the canopy of the trees. The protective fencing shall comply with BS.5837 and be retained throughout the period of construction unless otherwise agreed in writing by the local planning authority.
Reason: To protect the trees/hedgerow during the course of development in the interest of visual amenity.
11. No development shall commence on the construction of the hereby approved replacement dwelling, until the existing dwelling (known as ‘102 Main Road’) has been demolished in its entirety, unless otherwise agreed by the Local Planning Authority.
Reason: To ensure that there would be no more than 1 dwelling on the site, in the interests of residential amenity and because the site lies within the countryside, where additional dwellinghouses are only permitted in exceptional circumstances.
12. In the event that contamination which has not already been identified to the Local Planning Authority (LPA) is found or suspected on the site it must be reported in writing immediately to the Local Planning Authority. Unless agreed in writing by the LPA no further development (including any construction, demolition, site clearance, removal of underground tanks and relic structures) shall take place until this condition has been complied with in its entirety.
An investigation and risk assessment must be completed in accordance with a scheme which is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken by competent persons and conform with prevailing guidance (including BS 10175:2011+A1:2013 and CLR11) and a written report of the findings must be produced. The written report is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority.
Where remediation is necessary a detailed remediation method statement (RMS) must be prepared, and is subject to the approval in writing of the Local Planning Authority. The RMS must include detailed methodologies for all works to be undertaken, site management procedures, proposed remediation objectives and remediation criteria. The approved RMS must be carried out in its entirety and the Local Planning Authority must be given two weeks written notification prior to the commencement of the remedial works.
Following completion of the approved remediation scheme a validation report that demonstrates the effectiveness of the remediation must be submitted to and approved in writing by the LPA.
Reason: To ensure that risks from land contamination to the future users of the land and neighbouring land are minimised, together with those to controlled waters, property and ecological systems, and to ensure that the development can be carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other offsite receptors.
Informatives:
1. The Local Planning Authority has assessed the proposal against all material considerations including planning policies and any comments that may have been received. The planning application has been approved in accordance with the objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework and local plan to promote the delivery of sustainable development and to approach decision taking in a positive way.
2. East Suffolk Council is a Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Charging Authority.
The proposed development referred to in this planning permission may be chargeable development liable to pay Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) under Part 11 of the Planning Act 2008 and the CIL Regulations 2010 (as amended).
If your development is for the erection of a new building, annex or extension or the change of use of a building over 100sqm in internal area or the creation of a new dwelling, holiday let of any size or convenience retail , your development may be liable to pay CIL and you must submit a CIL Form 2 (Assumption of Liability) and CIL Form 1 (CIL Questions) form as soon as possible to CIL@eastsuffolk.gov.uk
A CIL commencement Notice (CIL Form 6) must be submitted at least 24 hours prior to the commencement date. The consequences of not submitting CIL Forms can result in the loss of payment by instalments, surcharges and other CIL enforcement action.
CIL forms can be downloaded direct from the planning portal:
https://www.planningportal.co.uk/info/200136/policy_and_legislation/70/community_infrastructure_levy/5
Guidance is viewable at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/community-infrastructure-levy