5
The Licensing Officer summarised the report ES/2822, advising the Sub-Committee that an application had been made for a new premises licence at Felixstowe Ferry Golf Club.
The Licensing Sub-Committee was being held as 3 representations had been received from local residents. There were no objections from any responsible authorities.
Councillor Reeves asked if there had been any complaints received. The Licensing Officer advised they had one on file which was from 2018.
One of the Objectors noted that she had made several complaints and questioned why they were not referred to. The Licensing Officer confirmed that they only had one complaint logged with licensing.
The Chair invited the application to speak.
The applicant told the Sub-Committee that they were having a new club house built approximately 100 yards from the current building. They were unable to transfer their existing licence to the new premises and therefore were seeking a new licence with minor amendments.
They were seeking earlier start times for licensable activities, an extension of alcohol sales on four days compared to the current licence, the inclusion of late-night refreshment permissions primarily to cover exceptional occasions such as New Year’s Eve (this was not intended for regular use or promotion).
The venue would remain primarily a golf club, not a nightclub or events venue. Events would not be held frequently and would follow similar timings to the existing licence. There would be a function room, but it was positioned as far as possible from nearby residential properties to minimise disturbance.
Outlining the new clubhouse and facilities, the applicant said the new clubhouse was further away from residential areas, improving the separation from neighbours. A café would operate as a public facility, with alcohol sales expected only until around 7pm in summer and no intention to operate late into the evening. The terraced would be primarily for members’ use. A “halfway hut” would allow members to purchase drinks while on the course.
They were putting into place the following measures to prevent public nuisance and minimise impact on local residents.
• Installation of comprehensive CCTV (internal and external).
• A controlled private car park with an automated barrier, restricting access to authorised users only.
• Café visitors would be directed to a separate public car park.
• Improved lighting in the car park would enhance safety and reduce nuisance.
• These measures aim to address previous issues and minimise impact on local residents.
The applicant told the Sub-Committee that the last recorded licensing complaint was in 2018, with no direct complaints received by the applicant in the past four years. The applicant acknowledged previous concerns (including noise) and expressed willingness to work with residents and stakeholders going forward. He recognised the importance of the representations received.
To conclude the applicant told the Sub-Committee that they considered the proposed amendments to be reasonable and proportionate. Their intention was to provide flexibility for the operation of the golf club and its function room while maintaining strong controls to protect the local amenity.
Councillor Reeves queried CCTV monitoring arrangements. It was confirmed that footage could be viewed via mobile phones and that staff would be on site throughout to monitor the system.
Councillor Reeves asked how noise impacts on the five proposed houses, which would be closer to the clubhouse than existing properties, would be mitigated.
The applicant advised that the function room was located furthest from the proposed dwellings and that acoustic measures would be considered through the Building Regulations process. Prospective residents were aware of the proximity to the clubhouse, and the development had received a supportive response, with some expressing an interest in joining the golf club.
The Sub-Committee referred to concerns raised by objectors that forthcoming events were only advertised through a password-protected website and asked whether event information could be made more accessible to local residents.
The applicant confirmed that this could be explored, including providing information on the public website and adding an events calendar or planner to notify residents of forthcoming events.
An objector asked what steps would be taken to monitor noise levels from events, particularly outdoor events held on the proposed lawn areas, to ensure there would be no nuisance to neighbouring residents.
The applicant advised that acoustic measures would form part of the building regulations requirements to help contain noise within the building. In relation to outdoor events, it was stated that residents would be informed in advance where appropriate, and that any events involving music would be managed to minimise disturbance. The applicant indicated that outdoor activities would not be expected to continue beyond 9.00pm, with events moving indoors where necessary.
The Sub-Committee asked whether the applicant would accept a condition preventing the lawn area from being used for events with amplified music after 9.00pm. The applicant confirmed that such a condition would be acceptable. It was explained that any music would be moved indoors after that time and that use of the lawn would be more likely for afternoon wedding receptions rather than activities such as discos or late-night entertainment.
The first objector read out their application that had been included as appendix C of the report. In summary they expressed concerns that the application could lead to increased public nuisance, particularly from noise associated with extended operating hours, more frequent events, outdoor activities on the proposed lawns, off-sales of alcohol and late-night refreshment.
The objector stated that noise from music and announcements at previous events has caused disturbance to nearby residents and raised concerns that the proposed licence would increase the frequency and duration of such disturbance. Concerns were also raised regarding the potential use of the lawns and marquee events, the impact of Temporary Event Notices, and the lack of publicly available information about forthcoming events.
The objector further opposed the proposed off-sales of alcohol and late-night refreshment activities, citing concerns about anti-social behaviour, litter and increased vehicle movements. The objector requested that these activities be refused and that existing licence conditions be retained and strengthened, including measures to improve communication with residents and minimise noise impacts.
The primary concern was the prevention of public nuisance, particularly noise affecting nearby homes.
Councillor Reeves asked whether the objector's concerns would be reduced if the applicant agreed to cease outdoor activities after 9.00pm and limit late-night refreshment until 1.00am to customers within the licensed premises.
The objector stated that a 9.00pm finish for outdoor activities would be reasonable but remained concerned that music could be played from 9.00am to 9.00pm, causing prolonged disturbance to residents. They also felt that insufficient detail had been provided on how noise levels would be monitored and managed.
The Licensing Officer advised that, should the licence be granted, there would be an opportunity to seek a review if the premises failed to uphold the licensing objectives, noting that a licence is not indefinite and can be reviewed where concerns arise.
The applicant stated that there was a number for the public to contact on the Website.
The second objector made their representation.
The objector raised a number of concerns regarding the application and the extent of the activities proposed. They considered the proposed hours for licensable activities, including music from 9.00am to 9.00pm, alcohol sales until 11.30pm and late-night refreshment, to be excessive, particularly as they would be permitted every day. The objector stated they would be more comfortable with more limited hours and conditions similar to those currently in place.
The objector expressed concern that live and recorded music and dancing could take place both inside and outside the premises, stating that the scale of the application was inappropriate for a golf club located within a residential area. They acknowledged the amendments and concessions offered by the applicant but considered the proposed operation to be significantly different from the existing arrangements.
Concerns were also raised in relation to public safety. The objector noted the club's proximity to the cliff edge, steps leading to the beach and the sea, and suggested that extended alcohol sales could increase the risk of individuals entering the water in unsafe conditions. Reference was made to recent incidents involving fatalities associated with cold-water immersion.
The objector further raised concerns regarding crime and disorder, particularly the potential impact of extended alcohol sales on the nearby public areas, including the beach, public toilets, putting green and café. They suggested that longer alcohol service hours could increase the risk of crime, disorder and public nuisance. Concerns were also expressed regarding the proposed sale of alcohol from the halfway hut and the potential impact on nearby residents and visitors.
Additional concerns related to the location of the premises on the edge of an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, with the objector stating that the application could detract from the quiet enjoyment of the area. They also highlighted concerns about increased vehicle movements, particularly late at night, noise nuisance affecting nearby homes due to prevailing winds carrying sound, the impact on nearby new residential properties, and disturbance to users of local public rights of way and permissive paths.
The objector also raised concerns about the potential for increased litter, although they welcomed the applicant's assurances regarding site management. Drawing on personal experience of event management, they noted that alcohol-related incidents involving individuals entering potentially hazardous areas can occur and considered this a relevant consideration for the application.
Councillor Reeves asked whether the objector would still object if music were restricted to indoors after 9.00pm. The objector confirmed that, in those circumstances, they would no longer object to that aspect of the application but would maintain their objections regarding the proposed sale of alcohol, late-night refreshment and the extent of the hours sought.
The third objector agreed with the points made by the first two objectors and noted that the venue did not provide overnight accommodation for wedding guests and expressed concern that attendees leaving late at night would result in increased vehicle movements, including taxis and coaches, causing disturbance along surrounding roads. They stated that noise from departing guests and traffic could carry into nearby residential areas and believed that regular events at the golf club could lead to increased incidences of rowdy behaviour and disturbance. Reference was made to a recent incident involving an individual causing a disturbance within the premises. The objector considered that such impacts could adversely affect nearby residents, including young families.
The Chair invited all parties to sum up.
There was nothing further from the licensing officer.
The objector added that street lighting in the area was switched off at approximately 11.30pm and that the area around the car park was very dark. They expressed concern for the safety of people leaving the premises on foot late at night and considered that increased evening activity could result in noise and disturbance for nearby residents as people make their way through the surrounding residential area.
The applicant said that the main change was an earlier start time of 9.00am rather than 11.00am, together with an additional 30 minutes on four days of the week. They stated that there was no intention to actively advertise late-night refreshment, which would primarily be required for functions and New Year's Eve events.
The applicant stated that they wished to maintain a good relationship with neighbouring residents and were willing to be flexible. They indicated that they would be content for music to be restricted after 9.00pm and explained that one lawn would be used in connection with functions, while the second lawn would serve the café and would not be used after 7.00pm.
The Sub-Committee adjourned to make their decision.
Decision Notice
Felixstowe Ferry Golf Club Ltd (the applicant) has applied for a new premises licence at Ferry Road, Felixstowe Suffolk, IP11 9RY. This is for the supply of alcohol (on and off sales) and live and recorded music, performances of dance, late night refreshment, and anything of a similar description to that falling within sections (e), (f) or (g) of the licensable activities on the application. The proposed opening hours are Monday to Sunday 05:30 to 01:00, New Year’s Eve/Day until 02:30 and private functions until 01:30.
The Sub-Committee first heard from the Licensing Officer, who summarised the report. The Licensing Officer confirmed that the Sub-Committee had been held as three representations against the application had been received from other persons (local residents). No representations were received from any Responsible Authorities.
The Sub-Committee then heard from the Applicant who explained that they were having a new clubhouse built and as they were unable to transfer their current licence to the new premises, they were seeking amendments to this new licence. They were seeking earlier start times for licensable activities and the extension of alcohol sales. The Applicant stated that the inclusion of late-night refreshment permissions was primarily to cover exceptional occasions such as New Year’s Eve and not intended for regular use or promotion. The venue would continue to operate mainly as a golf club, with only occasional events held in line with existing licensing hours. The function room was located away from nearby homes to reduce noise and disturbance. The café would operate as a public facility, with alcohol sales only until around 7pm in summer and no intention to operate late into the evening. The terrace area would be primarily for members’ use. A “halfway hut” would allow members to purchase drinks while on the course.
The Applicant noted that the last recorded licensing complaint was in 2018, with no direct complaints received in the past four years. The applicant acknowledged the concerns raised and expressed willingness to work with residents going forward. The Applicant confirmed that CCTV would be in place. Following a question from the Sub-Committee, the Applicant confirmed they would be happy with a condition prohibiting outdoor music after 21:00.
The Sub-Committee then heard from those who made representations in objection to the application. The objectors raised concerns that the proposed licence changes would increase noise and disturbance in a residential area, particularly due to extended hours, additional events, off-sales, and late-night refreshment. They highlighted the site’s coastal location, where sound travelled easily, and reported previous issues with loud music, events overrunning permitted times, and limited communication about upcoming activities.
Particular concern was expressed about the use of outdoor lawns and potential marquee events, which could intensify noise impacts. The objectors also feared off-sales and takeaway use could lead to anti-social behaviour, litter, and increased traffic. There is no street lighting in the area after 23:00 and concerns were raised about the proximity of the cliff. Concerns were also raised about increased vehicle noise from people leaving the venue.
The decision of the Sub-Committee
The Sub-Committee, having considered the application, the Licensing Officer’s report and the representations received from the applicant and the objectors has decided to grant the?application subject to such conditions as are consistent with the operating schedule, modified as follows:
• The applicant will publish on their website (publicly accessible), with at least 48 hours’ notice, start and finish times of any events which will finish later than 23:00.
• No live or amplified music will be permitted outdoors after 21:00.
• A contact number for the premises should be available on the applicant’s website.
The licensable and opening hours are granted as applied for with the exception of the prohibition of live and recorded music outdoors after 21:00.
PROPOSED LICENSABLE ACTIVITIES
Live and recorded music (indoors)
Monday to Sunday 09:00 to 00:00
New Years Eve/Day until 01:30
Live and Recorded music (outdoors)
Monday to Sunday 09:00 to 21:00
New Years Eve/Day until 21:00
Performance of dance (indoors and outdoors)
Monday to Sunday 09:00 to 00:00
New Years Eve/Day until 01:30
Anything of a similar description to that falling within (e), (f), (g)
(Indoors and outdoors)
Monday to Sunday 09:00 to 00:00
New Years Eve/Day until 01:30
Late night refreshment (indoors and outdoors)
Monday to Sunday 23:00 to 01:00
New Year’s Eve/Day until 02:30
Supply of Alcohol (On and Off the premises)
Monday to Sunday 09:00 to 23:30
New Year’s Eve/Day until 01:30
Major Sporting events in other parts of the World Starting from 07:00.
Early start charity and major golf club competitions, (May, June, July, August)
Private functions till 00:00
PROPOSED OPENING HOURS
Monday to Sunday 05:30 to 01:00
New Year’s Eve/Day until 02:30
Private functions until 01:30
Reasons for decision
The Sub-Committee notes under paragraph 9.12 of the Statutory Guidance that the responsible authorities are experts in their respective fields. The Sub-Committee took great weight in making its decision upon the lack of objection from responsible authorities, most notably the Police and Environmental Protection as they are the main source of information on prevention of public nuisance.
The Sub-Committee considered the Council’s own guidance in relation to licensing objectives and that each new licence should be considered on individual merit. Additionally, 6.1 of the Council’s Policy states that the Sub-Committee should not seek to restrict the trading hours of any particular premises unless it is considered appropriate to promote one or more of the licensing objectives. As the applicant has previous experience of running a licensed premises the Sub-Committee is confident that the applicant is capable of promoting the licensing objectives.
The Sub-Committee also took into account the representations from the objectors and added conditions to alleviate these concerns.
The Sub-Committee advises that if the objectors experience any public nuisance as a result of this licence being granted then it can be reported to the Council. Anyone, including residents, can call for a review of a premises licence.
In arriving at this decision, the Sub-Committee has taken into consideration the representations of both the applicant and the objectors as well as the Licensing Officer’s report. The Sub-Committee also considered the Council’s own licensing guidance and statement of licensing policy, as well as the Statutory Section 182 guidance, and Human Rights Act 1998.
The applicant/licence holder or anyone who has made a representation has the right to appeal to the Magistrates’ Court within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision.
Date: 22 June 2026