Decision Details

  • General
  • Reports

This section allows you to view the general details of a Decision

Details

Status:
Decision Subject To Call In
Business Item
General Fund Budget 2026/27 and Medium-Term Financial Strategy (MTFS)
Ref.
ES/2667
Is a Key Decision:
No
Decision Type:
Committee
Decision Maker:
Cabinet
Date of Decision
Tue 13 Jan 2026
Show on Forward Plan
No
Description
Report of the Cabinet Member with responsibility for Resources and Value for Money (appendix C to follow)
Matter for Decision (to consider...)
To consider the draft Medium Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) and the Council’s General Fund Budget for 2026/27.  
Service Area
Financial Services, Corporate Performance & Risk Management
Service Area 2
Not Applicable
Contact for Background Papers:
Lorraine Rogers
Chief Finance Officer and Section 151 Officer
Lorraine.rogers@eastsuffolk.gov.uk
 
Background Papers:
See report
Is Decision District Wide
Yes
Decision Made

That Cabinet:

1. Approved the draft Medium Term Financial Strategy detailed in Section 2, and supporting appendices, for review and consideration by the Overview & Scrutiny Committee as part of the budget process.

2. Approved an initial proposed Band D Council Tax for East Suffolk Council of £197.82 for 2026/27, an increase of £5.67 (2.95%).

Reason for Decision

1. The Council has a statutory duty to deliver a balanced budget for the forthcoming year, and Full Council will consider the 2026/27 budget at its meeting on 25 February 2026.

2. Part of the process of delivering a robust medium-term strategy to enable the Council to manage its affairs soundly, is to have regard to both external and internal risks, and to identify actions to mitigate those risks. MTFS key principles and a risk analysis together with mitigating actions are provided in Appendix B of the MTFS.

3. Section 25 of the Local Government Act 2003 places a personal duty on an authority’s Chief Financial Officer to make a report to Council about the robustness of the estimates made for the purposes of the council tax calculations and the adequacy of financial reserves and balances. The Act also requires the Council to have regard to the report before it makes its budget and council tax decisions.

4. In relation to the statutory duty under the Act, the Chief Financial Officer considers that the estimates are robust; the General Fund Balance is within the guideline levels established as part of the MTFS; and the contributions to and use of earmarked reserves will assist the Council in meeting its financial challenges and developing its response to the pandemic and the objective of financial sustainability.

5. The Chief Finance Officer’s report will be reported to Full Council when it considers the budget for 2026/27 on 25 February 2026. The report statement will clearly set out the budget assumptions used to arrive at the final recommendations.

6. This report brings together the relevant information to enable Cabinet to review, consider, and comment upon the Council’s General Fund revenue budgets before making final recommendations to Council on 25 February 2026. This report also forms the basis of the Overview & Scrutiny Committee’s review of the Budget at its meeting on 29 January 2026 as required under the Budget and Policy Framework.

Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
Setting a balanced budget for the coming year is a statutory requirement, therefore no other options are considered appropriate.
Any Declarations of Interest Declared
None
Any Dispensation Granted
None

Decision Criteria

This Decision does not contain any decision criteria records.

Wards

Aldeburgh and Leiston; Beccles and Worlingham; Bungay and Wainford; Carlford and Fynn Valley; Carlton and Whitton; Carlton Colville; Deben; Eastern Felixstowe; Framlingham; Gunton and St Margarets; Halesworth and Blything; Harbour and Normanston; Kelsale and Yoxford; Kesgrave; Kessingland; Kirkley and Pakefield; Lothingland; Martlesham and Purdis Farm; Melton; Orwell and Villages; Oulton Broad; Rendlesham and Orford; Rushmere St Andrew; Saxmundham; Southwold; Western Felixstowe; Wickham Market; Woodbridge; Wrentham, Wangford and Westleton

Topics

This Decision does not contain any Topic records

Overview and Scrutiny

This Decision does not contain any Overview and Scrutiny records.

This section allows you to view the reports for the Decision.

This section displays the history of the Decision.

Decision History

Date & Time CreatedUser Full NameStatus DescriptionDetails
 Page 1 of 6, items 1 to 10 of 54.
05/01/2026 14:25:45Alli StoneBusiness Item Created 
05/01/2026 14:25:45Alli StoneCommittee AddedCabinet
05/01/2026 14:25:45Alli StoneMeeting Added13/01/2026 6:00PM
05/01/2026 14:26:14Alli StoneWard AddedAldeburgh and Leiston
05/01/2026 14:26:14Alli StoneWard AddedBeccles and Worlingham
05/01/2026 14:26:14Alli StoneWard AddedBungay and Wainford
05/01/2026 14:26:14Alli StoneWard AddedCarlford and Fynn Valley
05/01/2026 14:26:14Alli StoneWard AddedCarlton and Whitton
05/01/2026 14:26:14Alli StoneWard AddedCarlton Colville
05/01/2026 14:26:14Alli StoneWard AddedDeben

Approval/Comments

No history found.