Decision Details

  • General
  • Reports
  • Decision History

This section allows you to view the general details of a Decision

Details

Status:
Implemented
Business Item
Public Space Protection Orders - Dog Controls
Ref.
ES/0289
Is a Key Decision:
No
Decision Type:
Committee
Decision Maker:
Cabinet
Date of Decision
Tue 4 Feb 2020
Show on Forward Plan
No
Description
Report of the Cabinet Member with responsibility for The Environment
Matter for Decision (to consider...)

1. That the draft Public Space Protection Orders in respect of Charsfield Churchyard, as proposed, be adopted.

2. That an amended version of the consultation draft for Lound Lakes which preserves an existing field approximately comprising approximately 4 Hectares, where dogs may safely be exercised off the lead, be adopted.

3. That delegated authority be given to the Cabinet Member for The Environment to adopt the draft Public Space Protection Order, subject to the outcome of further consultation with the Broads National Park Authority.

Service Area
Environmental Services & Port Health
Service Area 2
Not Applicable
Contact for Background Papers:
Background Papers:
Is Decision District Wide
No
Decision Made

1. That the draft Public Space Protection Orders in respect of Charsfield Churchyard, as proposed, be adopted.

 

2. That an amended version of the consultation draft for Lound Lakes which preserves an existing field comprising approximately 4 Hectares, where dogs may safely be exercised off the lead, be adopted.

 

3. That delegated authority be given to the Cabinet Member for The Environment to adopt the draft Public Space Protection Order for Herringfleet Hills, subject to the outcome of further consultation with the Broads National Park Authority.

Reason for Decision
1. Subject to a minor amendment in the case of the proposal affecting Lound Lakes, the results of the consultation support the introduction of the PSPOs as detailed in Appendix A and this now requires approval by Cabinet before the Orders can be made.

2. Public Space Protection Orders are recommended to ensure effective and appropriate controls over the specified activities within the district.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
A breach of a PSPO can be dealt with by way of a Fixed Penalty Notice rather than prosecution under existing byelaws which can be time consuming and expensive.
Any Declarations of Interest Declared
None.
Any Dispensation Granted
None.

Decision Criteria

This Decision does not contain any decision criteria records.

Wards

Carlford and Fynn Valley; Lothingland

Topics

This Decision does not contain any Topic records

Overview and Scrutiny

This Decision does not contain any Overview and Scrutiny records.

This section displays the history of the Decision.

Decision History

DateTimeCreatedUserFullnameStatusDescriptionDetails
123
 Page 1 of 3, items 1 to 10 of 21.
23/01/2020 14:56:47Matt MakinBusiness Item Created 
23/01/2020 14:56:47Matt MakinCommittee AddedCabinet
23/01/2020 14:56:47Matt MakinMeeting Added04/02/2020 6:30PM
23/01/2020 14:57:10Matt MakinWard AddedCarlford and Fynn Valley
23/01/2020 14:57:10Matt MakinWard AddedLothingland
23/01/2020 14:57:17 General Details EditedReference Number Generated (ES/0289)
23/01/2020 14:57:17Matt MakinStatus ChangedDecision Scheduled [1]
23/01/2020 15:00:53Matt MakinReport AddedDocument ID 4230: ES-0289 - PSPO Dog Controls
23/01/2020 15:01:32Matt MakinReport AddedDocument ID 4231: ES-0289 - Appendix A1 Lound Lakes Draft PSPO
23/01/2020 15:01:33Matt MakinReport AddedDocument ID 4232: ES-0289 - Appendix A2 Draft PSPO Charsfield Churchyard

Approval/Comments

No history found.