Decision Details

  • General
  • Reports

This section allows you to view the general details of a Decision

Details

Status:
Implemented
Business Item
Public Space Protection Orders - Dog Controls
Ref.
ES/0289
Is a Key Decision:
No
Decision Type:
Committee
Decision Maker:
Cabinet
Date of Decision
Tue 4 Feb 2020
Show on Forward Plan
No
Description
Report of the Cabinet Member with responsibility for The Environment
Matter for Decision (to consider...)

1. That the draft Public Space Protection Orders in respect of Charsfield Churchyard, as proposed, be adopted.

2. That an amended version of the consultation draft for Lound Lakes which preserves an existing field approximately comprising approximately 4 Hectares, where dogs may safely be exercised off the lead, be adopted.

3. That delegated authority be given to the Cabinet Member for The Environment to adopt the draft Public Space Protection Order, subject to the outcome of further consultation with the Broads National Park Authority.

Service Area
Environmental Services & Port Health
Service Area 2
Not Applicable
Contact for Background Papers:
Background Papers:
Is Decision District Wide
No
Decision Made

1. That the draft Public Space Protection Orders in respect of Charsfield Churchyard, as proposed, be adopted.

 

2. That an amended version of the consultation draft for Lound Lakes which preserves an existing field comprising approximately 4 Hectares, where dogs may safely be exercised off the lead, be adopted.

 

3. That delegated authority be given to the Cabinet Member for The Environment to adopt the draft Public Space Protection Order for Herringfleet Hills, subject to the outcome of further consultation with the Broads National Park Authority.

Reason for Decision
1. Subject to a minor amendment in the case of the proposal affecting Lound Lakes, the results of the consultation support the introduction of the PSPOs as detailed in Appendix A and this now requires approval by Cabinet before the Orders can be made.

2. Public Space Protection Orders are recommended to ensure effective and appropriate controls over the specified activities within the district.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected
A breach of a PSPO can be dealt with by way of a Fixed Penalty Notice rather than prosecution under existing byelaws which can be time consuming and expensive.
Any Declarations of Interest Declared
None.
Any Dispensation Granted
None.

Decision Criteria

This Decision does not contain any decision criteria records.

Wards

Carlford and Fynn Valley; Lothingland

Topics

This Decision does not contain any Topic records

Overview and Scrutiny

This Decision does not contain any Overview and Scrutiny records.

This section displays the history of the Decision.

Decision History

Date & Time CreatedUser Full NameStatus DescriptionDetails
123
 Page 2 of 3, items 11 to 20 of 21.
23/01/2020 15:01:34Matt MakinReport AddedDocument ID 4233: ES-0289 - Appendix A3 Draft PSPO Herringfleet Hills
23/01/2020 15:01:35Matt MakinReport AddedDocument ID 4234: ES-0289 - Appendix B1 Redacted Herringfleet Hills Consultation Responses
23/01/2020 15:01:36Matt MakinReport AddedDocument ID 4235: ES-0289 - Appendix B2 Redacted Lound Lakes Consultation Response
27/01/2020 13:21:58Matt MakinGeneral Details Edited 
06/02/2020 10:06:54Maxine GreenStatus ChangedDecision Subject To Call In [3]
06/02/2020 11:56:08Matt MakinGeneral Details Edited 
24/03/2020 16:34:42Karen CookStatus ChangedImplemented [7]
25/03/2020 13:57:38Matt MakinStatus ChangedImplemented [7]
14/04/2020 14:25:53Matt MakinStatus ChangedImplemented [7]
14/04/2020 14:41:37Matt MakinStatus ChangedImplemented [7]

Approval/Comments

No history found.